- Home
- Business Review
- Divisional results
- Volatility
Volatility
Banking volatility
Since the introduction of IFRS in 2005, in order to provide a clearer view of the underlying performance of the business, the Group has separately disclosed within Central group items the effects of marking-to-market derivatives held for risk management purposes. This amount, net of the effect of the Group’s IAS 39 compliant hedge accounting relationships, was previously disclosed as banking volatility.
The use of fair values in financial reporting is now more widespread and there is a better understanding of their effects; consequently, in line with evolving best practice, the Group no longer considers it appropriate to disclose banking volatility separately. Divisions will continue to transfer, through the Group’s internal transfer pricing arrangements, to Group Corporate Treasury (included in Central Group Items) the movements in the market value of hedging derivatives where the impact is not locally managed.
Insurance volatility
The Group’s insurance businesses have liability products that are supported by substantial holdings of investments, including equities, property and fixed interest investments, all of which have a volatile fair value. The value of the liabilities does not move exactly in line with changes in the fair value of the investments, yet IFRS requires that the changes in both the value of the liabilities and investments be reflected within the income statement. As these investments are substantial and movements in their fair value can have a significant impact on the profitability of the Insurance and Investments division, management believes that it is appropriate to disclose the division’s results on the basis of an expected return in addition to the actual return. The difference between the actual return on these investments and the expected return based upon economic assumptions made at the beginning of the year is included within insurance volatility.
Changes in market variables also affect the realistic valuation of the guarantees and options embedded within products written in the Scottish Widows With Profit Fund, the value of the in-force business and the value of shareholders’ funds. Fluctuations in these values caused by changes in market variables, including market spreads reflecting credit risk premia, are also included within insurance volatility. These market credit spreads represent the gap between the yield on corporate bonds and the yield on government bonds, and reflect the market’s assessment of credit risk. Changes in the credit spreads affect the value of the in-force business asset in respect of the annuity portfolio.
The expected investment returns used to determine the normalised profit of the business, which are based on prevailing market rates and published research into historic investment return differentials, are set out below:
| 2008 % |
2007 % |
2006 % |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gilt yields (gross) | 4.55 | 4.62 | 4.12 |
| Equity returns (gross) | 7.55 | 7.62 | 6.72 |
| Dividend yield | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
| Property return (gross) | 7.55 | 7.62 | 6.72 |
| Corporate bonds (gross) | 5.15 | 5.22 | 4.72 |
During 2007, profit before tax included negative insurance volatility of £267 million, being a credit of £7 million to net interest income and a charge of £274 million to other income (2006: positive volatility of £84 million, being a credit of £2 million to net interest income and a credit of £82 million to other income). The effect of widening credit risk spreads and falling gilt values more than offset the favourable impact of a modest increase in equity values and changes in market consistent assumptions. During 2006 increases in equity values were partly offset by lower gilt values.
Policyholder interests volatility
As a result of the requirement under IFRS to consolidate the Group’s life and pensions businesses on a line-by-line basis, the Group’s income statement includes amounts attributable to policyholders which affect profit before tax; the most significant of these items is policyholder tax.
Under IFRS, tax on policyholder investment returns is required to be included in the Group’s tax charge rather than being offset against the related income, as it is in actual distributions made to policyholders. The impact is, therefore, to either increase or decrease profit before tax with a corresponding change in the tax charge. Other items classified within policyholder interests volatility include the effects of investment vehicles which are only majority owned by the long-term assurance funds. In the case of these vehicles, the Group’s profit for the year includes the minorities’ share of the profits earned. As set out below these amounts do not accrue to the equity holders, accordingly management believes a clearer representation of the underlying performance of the Group’s life and pensions businesses is presented by excluding policyholder interests volatility.
| 2007 £m |
2006 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | - | (33) |
| Other income | (233) | 359 |
| Profit before tax | (233) | 326 |
| Taxation - policyholder | 243 | (222) |
| Minority interests | (10) | (104) |
| Profit attributable to equity shareholders | - | - |
During 2007, profit before tax included negative policyholder interests volatility of £233 million, being a charge to other income (2006: positive volatility of £326 million, being a charge of £33 million to net interest income and a credit of £359 million to other income). In 2007, substantial policyholder tax losses have been generated as a result of a fall in property, gilt and bond values. These losses reduce future policyholder tax liabilities and have led to a policyholder tax credit during the year. Profits were recognised in 2006 as a result of positive market movements combined with realised gains in the holdings in property investment vehicles majority owned by the long-term assurance funds.